Daimler Truck, Volvo, Paccar, and International sue California over emissions rules, end Clean Truck Partnership

Daimler Truck, Volvo, Paccar, and International Motors have filed a lawsuit against California state authorities over what they call “excessively strict” emissions regulations that conflict with U.S. federal standards.

In a significant turn in the relationship between major truck manufacturers and the state of California, Daimler Truck, Volvo, Paccar, and International Motors have sued state regulators over what they argue are overly stringent emissions standards that clash with federal law. The legal action coincides with the formal dissolution of the Clean Truck Partnership, an agreement launched in 2023 intended to provide regulatory stability for the industry.

The Trigger: Revocation of California’s Waiver

The dispute escalated after President Donald Trump’s June 2025 decision to revoke California’s waiver, which had allowed the state to enforce emissions standards stricter than federal requirements.

The move left truck makers “caught in the crossfire” between state and federal rules, creating a situation they say makes long-term production planning nearly impossible.

According to the lawsuit filed Monday in federal court in Sacramento, the companies argue that the president’s decision nullifies California’s stricter standards and that the coexistence of conflicting regulatory frameworks directly harms the industry. “We can’t guarantee a steady production flow if the rules change by state and contradict federal regulations,” industry representatives told trade media.

The End of a Landmark Alliance

The lawsuit is paired with the collapse of the Clean Truck Partnership—a coalition formed in 2023 by nine truck makers, including Daimler, Volvo, Paccar, and International, along with the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the Engine Manufacturers Association (EMA). The pact was designed to secure commitments to California’s tougher standards in exchange for predictable, long-term regulatory conditions that would encourage investment and production.

During its brief existence, the partnership was hailed as a model of public–private cooperation aimed at accelerating the shift to zero-emission trucks and cutting the carbon footprint of heavy-duty transport. However, the recent legal offensive marks what industry site boerse-express calls “a dramatic shift in strategy.” Cooperation with CARB and Governor Gavin Newsom has given way to direct confrontation.

Industry Position and the Cost of Uncertainty

Manufacturers say the breakup is a direct result of the disconnect between state and federal policies. With California’s waiver gone, they argue, the legal foundation for tougher state-level standards no longer exists—yet the state continues to push its own emissions-reduction targets. This, they contend, creates regulatory uncertainty, adds costs, and opens the door to penalties for noncompliance.

Even though the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) on Tuesday dismissed antitrust concerns related to the Clean Truck Partnership, that decision was not enough to salvage the agreement. The plaintiffs maintain that the regulatory stability promised in 2023 has proven illusory, making the alliance pointless under current conditions.

Not All Partners on Board

So far, other members of the original coalition—including Cummins, Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis—have not joined the lawsuit. Their stance on this new phase of confrontation remains unclear. Industry analysts suggest these companies may be weighing the political and commercial risks of taking legal action against a state that has historically led the nation’s most ambitious environmental policies.

A Dispute With Broader Implications

Legal experts say the case could set an important precedent on the scope of state authority to impose stricter standards than those mandated by the federal government—an especially contentious issue in a politically polarized climate over environmental regulation.

The outcome could also slow the rollout of electric and zero-emission trucks in the U.S., at least in the short term, as regulatory uncertainty discourages investment in technologies that may not comply with all applicable frameworks.

An Evolving Landscape

The resolution will hinge on whether the courts determine that the federal decision indeed overrides California’s vehicle emissions authority. In the meantime, the heavy-duty trucking sector finds itself in legal limbo, with strategic alliances collapsing and regulatory stability appearing increasingly out of reach.

Against this backdrop, the dissolution of the Clean Truck Partnership and the lawsuit against California underscore not only the industry’s internal tensions but also the broader challenge of aligning public and private policies toward a shared goal: decarbonizing freight transport. What began in 2023 as a showcase of cooperation has, in just two years, turned into a high-stakes legal battle that could reshape the rules for sustainable mobility in the United States.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn